Screener
HYLS vs CGCP
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF vs Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
Key differences
- CGCP costs 0.35% less per year.
- CGCP is significantly larger than HYLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYLS is classified as alternative, while CGCP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- HYLS follows a long short strategy; CGCP uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, HYLS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HYLS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYLS | CGCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $7.6B |
| Since | 2013 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.65% | 5.14% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.56% | 3.74% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -15.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYLS and CGCP
Explore further