Screener
HYLS vs CGMU
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.42% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than HYLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYLS is classified as alternative, while CGMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- HYLS follows a long short strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HYLS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HYLS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYLS | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $5.8B |
| Since | 2013 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.65% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.56% | 2.28% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYLS and CGMU
Explore further