Screener
HYLS vs FOPC
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF vs Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF
Key differences
- HYLS costs 0.18% less per year.
- HYLS is significantly larger than FOPC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYLS is classified as alternative, while FOPC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- HYLS follows a long short strategy; FOPC uses active selection.
- HYLS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYLS | FOPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $33M |
| Since | 2013 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 6.65% | 4.27% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.56% | 2.87% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -2.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYLS and FOPC
Explore further