Screener
HYLS vs FTMA
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF vs Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Inc ETF
Key differences
- FTMA costs 0.34% less per year.
- HYLS is significantly larger than FTMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYLS is classified as alternative, while FTMA is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- HYLS follows a long short strategy; FTMA uses index tracking.
- HYLS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYLS | FTMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $273M |
| Since | 2013 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 6.65% | 3.15% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.57% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -2.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYLS and FTMA
Explore further