Screener
IALT vs ENHU
iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHU costs 0.77% less per year.
- IALT is significantly larger than ENHU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IALT is classified as alternative, while ENHU is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- IALT covers global markets; ENHU covers north america.
- IALT follows a systematic alpha strategy; ENHU uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IALT | ENHU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $210M | $9M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -1.47% | -8.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IALT and ENHU
Explore further