Screener
IAT vs IWL
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.23% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than IAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| IAT | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $625M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2006 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.76% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.4% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.3% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.75% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -55.55% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IAT and IWL
Explore further