Screener
IBAT vs IGV
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGV costs 0.08% less per year.
- IGV is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBAT covers global markets; IGV covers north america.
- IGV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | IGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $12.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.9% | -8.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.23% | 25.67% |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -45.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and IGV
Explore further