Screener
IBHK vs TLT
iShares iBonds 2031 Term High Y vs iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- TLT costs 0.20% less per year.
- TLT is significantly larger than IBHK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TLT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBHK | TLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $57M | $42.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 6.59% | 4.57% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.0% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.13% | 9.95% |
| Max drawdown | -4.83% | -48.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBHK and TLT
Explore further