Screener
IBLC vs EFV
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Key differences
- EFV costs 0.16% less per year.
- EFV is significantly larger than IBLC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBLC is classified as alternative, while EFV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IBLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBLC | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $30.0B |
| Since | 2022 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 3.83% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +76.5% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +51.9% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 55.29% | 14.28% |
| Max drawdown | -62.54% | -43.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBLC and EFV
Explore further