Screener
IBLC vs FENI
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Key differences
- FENI costs 0.19% less per year.
- FENI is significantly larger than IBLC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBLC is classified as alternative, while FENI is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- IBLC follows a index tracking strategy; FENI uses active selection.
- FENI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBLC | FENI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $9.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 2.93% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | europe |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +76.5% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +51.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 55.29% | 15.63% |
| Max drawdown | -62.54% | -14.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBLC and FENI
Explore further