Screener
IBLC vs IGM
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.08% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than IBLC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBLC is classified as alternative, while IGM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IBLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBLC | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $9.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 0.15% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +67.1% | +55.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +48.6% | +39.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 1.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 55.35% | 20.24% |
| Max drawdown | -62.54% | -40.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBLC and IGM
Explore further