Screener
IBRN vs IXJ
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF vs iShares Global Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- IXJ costs 0.07% less per year.
- IXJ is significantly larger than IBRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IBRN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBRN | IXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $3.6B |
| Since | 2022 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.8% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.00% | 14.45% |
| Max drawdown | -35.39% | -27.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBRN and IXJ
Explore further