Screener
ICAP vs CGMU
Infrastructure Capital Equity Income Fund ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 2.20% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than ICAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICAP is classified as alternative, while CGMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- ICAP follows a option income strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ICAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICAP | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.47% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $100M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 9.34% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.08% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -24.20% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICAP and CGMU
Explore further