Screener
ICLN vs AQWA
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Global X Clean Water ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.11% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than AQWA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AQWA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLN | AQWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $26M |
| Since | 2008 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +78.6% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.3% | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.99% | 14.38% |
| Max drawdown | -66.75% | -29.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLN and AQWA
Explore further