Screener
ICLN vs CGGO
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.08% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than ICLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICLN follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLN | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $10.1B |
| Since | 2008 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +87.9% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.34 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.93% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -66.75% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLN and CGGO
Explore further