Screener
ICLN vs CNRG
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.06% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than CNRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICLN is classified as equity, while CNRG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ICLN covers global markets; CNRG covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, CNRG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLN | CNRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $222M |
| Since | 2008 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 1.20% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +78.6% | +105.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.3% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.99% | 36.25% |
| Max drawdown | -66.75% | -68.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLN and CNRG
Explore further