Screener
ICLN vs DMXF
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF
Key differences
- DMXF costs 0.27% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, DMXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLN | DMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $992M |
| Since | 2008 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 4.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +78.6% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.3% | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.99% | 16.16% |
| Max drawdown | -66.75% | -34.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLN and DMXF
Explore further