Screener
ICLN vs EMCS
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
Key differences
- EMCS costs 0.24% less per year.
- ICLN covers global markets; EMCS covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EMCS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLN | EMCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $912M |
| Since | 2008 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 1.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +78.6% | +50.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.3% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.99% | 21.77% |
| Max drawdown | -66.75% | -44.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLN and EMCS
Explore further