Screener
ICLN vs LDEM
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF
Key differences
- LDEM costs 0.23% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than LDEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICLN covers global markets; LDEM covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, LDEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLN | LDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $34M |
| Since | 2008 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 3.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +78.6% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.3% | +2.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.99% | 17.58% |
| Max drawdown | -66.75% | -40.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLN and LDEM
Explore further