Screener
ICLN vs PEX
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 2.56% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than PEX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ICLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLN | PEX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 2.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $12M |
| Since | 2008 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 12.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +87.9% | -10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | -0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.34 | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.93% | 15.39% |
| Max drawdown | -66.75% | -49.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLN and PEX
Explore further