Screener
ICLO vs BCLO
Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF vs iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF
Key differences
- ICLO costs 0.26% less per year.
- ICLO is significantly larger than BCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLO | BCLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $448M | $74M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.26% | 6.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.38% | 2.12% |
| Max drawdown | -3.46% | -4.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLO and BCLO
Explore further