Screener
ICOP vs IYM
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF vs iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
Key differences
- IYM costs 0.09% less per year.
- IYM is significantly larger than ICOP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICOP | IYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $429M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.1% | +38.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.85% | 18.63% |
| Max drawdown | -38.67% | -42.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICOP and IYM
Explore further