Screener
ICSH vs BWX
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg International Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.27% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than BWX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICSH covers north america markets; BWX covers global ex us.
- ICSH follows a active selection strategy; BWX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICSH | BWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.3B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2013 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.41% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | -1.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | +0.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | -4.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.35 | -0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.41% | 7.81% |
| Max drawdown | -3.94% | -34.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICSH and BWX
Explore further