Screener
ICSH vs SCHQ
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHQ costs 0.05% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than SCHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICSH follows a active selection strategy; SCHQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICSH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICSH | SCHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.3B | $897M |
| Since | 2013 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 4.41% | 4.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | -1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | -5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.35 | -0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.41% | 9.07% |
| Max drawdown | -3.94% | -46.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICSH and SCHQ
Explore further