Screener
ICSH vs TLT
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.07% less per year.
- TLT is significantly larger than ICSH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICSH follows a active selection strategy; TLT uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TLT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICSH | TLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.3B | $42.9B |
| Since | 2013 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 4.41% | 4.57% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | -2.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.35 | -0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.41% | 9.95% |
| Max drawdown | -3.94% | -48.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICSH and TLT
Explore further