Screener
ICSH vs TUA
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.17% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than TUA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICSH is classified as fixed income, while TUA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICSH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICSH | TUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.3B | $802M |
| Since | 2013 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.41% | 3.63% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | -1.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | -2.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.35 | -0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.41% | 6.85% |
| Max drawdown | -3.94% | -15.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICSH and TUA
Explore further