Screener
IDNA vs HEAL
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF vs Global X HealthTech ETF
Key differences
- IDNA is significantly larger than HEAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IDNA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDNA | HEAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160M | $25M |
| Since | 2019 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.2% | -20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | -10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -7.5% | -14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.43% | 21.71% |
| Max drawdown | -68.26% | -65.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDNA and HEAL
Explore further