Screener
IDRV vs CCNR
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.09% less per year.
- IDRV follows a index tracking strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
- IDRV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDRV | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $161M | $394M |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 2.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.8% | +72.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.68% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -53.00% | -20.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDRV and CCNR
Explore further