Screener
IDU vs ZAP
iShares U.S. Utilities ETF vs Global X U.S. Electrification ETF
Key differences
- IDU costs 0.12% less per year.
- IDU is significantly larger than ZAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDU | ZAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $456M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.10% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +35.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.50% | 14.74% |
| Max drawdown | -36.18% | -12.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDU and ZAP
Explore further