Screener
IDUB vs AMAX
Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- IDUB costs 0.92% less per year.
- IDUB is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDUB follows a structured outcome strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, IDUB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDUB | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $468M | $60M |
| Since | 2021 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 5.19% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.9% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.36% | 9.98% |
| Max drawdown | -29.21% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDUB and AMAX
Explore further