Screener
IDVZ vs DIEM
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
Key differences
- DIEM costs 0.56% less per year.
- IDVZ is significantly larger than DIEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDVZ covers global markets; DIEM covers emerging markets.
- IDVZ follows a active selection strategy; DIEM uses index tracking.
- DIEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDVZ | DIEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $50M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 2.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +49.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.89% | 17.60% |
| Max drawdown | -10.99% | -38.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDVZ and DIEM
Explore further