Screener
IDVZ vs GEND
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- GEND costs 0.37% less per year.
- IDVZ is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDVZ is classified as equity, while GEND is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IDVZ covers global markets; GEND covers north america.
- IDVZ follows a active selection strategy; GEND uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDVZ | GEND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $4M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.89% | 10.70% |
| Max drawdown | -10.99% | -6.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDVZ and GEND
Explore further