Screener
IEMG vs MEM
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.70% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than MEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IEMG follows a index tracking strategy; MEM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IEMG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IEMG | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $151.2B | $53M |
| Since | 2012 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 3.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.7% | +52.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.02% | 20.59% |
| Max drawdown | -38.71% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IEMG and MEM
Explore further