Screener
IG vs APMU
Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF vs ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.16% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IG | APMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $179M | $224M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.06% | 2.64% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | -0.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.81% | 2.35% |
| Max drawdown | -23.17% | -4.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IG and APMU
Explore further