Screener
IG vs CGBL
Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.14% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than IG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IG is classified as fixed income, while CGBL is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- IG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IG | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $179M | $6.1B |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.06% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.81% | 9.65% |
| Max drawdown | -23.17% | -11.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IG and CGBL
Explore further