Screener
IG vs ENHI
Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.08% less per year.
- IG is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IG is classified as fixed income, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IG | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $179M | $11M |
| Since | 2018 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 5.06% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.81% | — |
| Max drawdown | -23.17% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IG and ENHI
Explore further