Screener
IG vs IWB
Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
IG is a fixed income ETF, while IWB is an equity ETF. IG charges 0.19% a year and IWB 0.15%.
- IG is a fixed income fund, while IWB is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- IG follows a active selection strategy; IWB uses index tracking.
- IWB is much larger than IG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IG | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $180M | $48.9B |
| Since | 2018 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 5.04% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.26 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.68% | 12.22% |
| Max drawdown | -23.17% | -34.60% |
Similar to IG and IWB
Explore further