Screener
IG vs PFIG
Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- IG follows a active selection strategy; PFIG uses index tracking.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IG | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $179M | $113M |
| Since | 2018 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 5.06% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | +1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.81% | 3.10% |
| Max drawdown | -23.17% | -15.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IG and PFIG
Explore further