Screener
IGCB vs ACLO
TCW Corporate Bond ETF vs Tcw Aaa Clo Etf
Key differences
- ACLO costs 0.15% less per year.
- ACLO is significantly larger than IGCB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGCB follows a index tracking strategy; ACLO uses active selection.
- IGCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGCB | ACLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $497M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.67% | 4.84% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.02% | 0.76% |
| Max drawdown | -4.20% | -1.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGCB and ACLO
Explore further