Screener
IGCB vs SLNZ
TCW Corporate Bond ETF vs TCW Senior Loan ETF
Key differences
- IGCB costs 0.30% less per year.
- SLNZ is significantly larger than IGCB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SLNZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGCB | SLNZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $227M |
| Since | 2018 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.67% | 7.57% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +3.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.02% | 4.47% |
| Max drawdown | -4.20% | -2.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGCB and SLNZ
Explore further