Screener
IGF vs CGGO
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.08% less per year.
- IGF follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $10.1B |
| Since | 2007 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.43% | 16.59% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and CGGO
Explore further