Screener
IGF vs DECO
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
Key differences
IGF is an equity ETF, while DECO is an alternative ETF. IGF charges 0.39% a year and DECO 0.65%.
- IGF is an equity fund, while DECO is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- IGF follows a index tracking strategy; DECO uses structured outcome.
- IGF costs 0.26% less per year.
- IGF is much larger than DECO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | DECO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.6B | $23M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.97% | 0.67% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.6% | +139.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.52% | 45.00% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -47.71% |
Similar to IGF and DECO
Explore further