Screener
IGF vs PIO
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs Invesco Global Water ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.36% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than PIO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | PIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $281M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +8.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 14.70% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -35.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and PIO
Explore further