Screener
IGHG vs LQDH
ProShares Investment Grade—Interest Rate Hedged vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- LQDH costs 0.06% less per year.
- IGHG is classified as alternative, while LQDH is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- IGHG follows a tactical allocation strategy; LQDH uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGHG | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $276M | $506M |
| Since | 2013 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 5.14% | 6.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.7% | +8.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +8.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.2% | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 1.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.50% | 2.73% |
| Max drawdown | -25.16% | -24.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGHG and LQDH
Explore further