Screener
IGM vs ARTY
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF vs iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.08% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than ARTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGM covers north america markets; ARTY covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IGM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGM | ARTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.5B | $2.8B |
| Since | 2001 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.15% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.0% | +90.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +39.3% | +32.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.2% | +12.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.38 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.24% | 29.13% |
| Max drawdown | -40.68% | -54.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGM and ARTY
Explore further