Screener
IGM vs IHF
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF vs iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
Key differences
- IGM is significantly larger than IHF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IGM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGM | IHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.5B | $777M |
| Since | 2001 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.15% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.0% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +39.3% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.2% | -0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.38 | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.24% | 21.56% |
| Max drawdown | -40.68% | -35.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGM and IHF
Explore further