Screener
IGM vs PWRD
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF vs TCW Transform Systems ETF
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.36% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than PWRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGM follows a index tracking strategy; PWRD uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IGM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGM | PWRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.5B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2001 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +59.6% | +41.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +39.5% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.34% | 23.59% |
| Max drawdown | -40.68% | -25.87% |
Similar to IGM and PWRD
Explore further