Screener
IGM vs ROM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF vs ProShares Ultra Technology
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.56% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than ROM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGM follows a index tracking strategy; ROM uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGM | ROM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.5B | $961M |
| Since | 2001 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.15% | 0.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +59.6% | +141.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +39.5% | +58.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.8% | +30.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.34% | 41.47% |
| Max drawdown | -40.68% | -67.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGM and ROM
Explore further