Screener
IGM vs XPND
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF vs First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.26% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than XPND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGM follows a index tracking strategy; XPND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IGM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGM | XPND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.5B | $37M |
| Since | 2001 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.15% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.0% | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +39.3% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.38 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.24% | 17.70% |
| Max drawdown | -40.68% | -38.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGM and XPND
Explore further