Screener
IGPT vs BOTZ
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF vs Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- IGPT costs 0.12% less per year.
- BOTZ is significantly larger than IGPT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IGPT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGPT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGPT | BOTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $875M | $3.4B |
| Since | 2005 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.03% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +119.4% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +42.7% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.6% | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.47% | 24.21% |
| Max drawdown | -50.14% | -55.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGPT and BOTZ
Explore further